Staying ahead of environmental legislation.

Recent legislation at both the federal and state levels in the U.S., particularly in California, underscores a strong commitment to promoting composting as a critical component of waste management. These laws and initiatives aim to reduce landfill waste, mitigate methane emissions, and support the development of composting infrastructure.

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) policies are regulatory measures aimed at making producers responsible for the entire lifecycle of their products, especially for take-back, recycling, and final disposal. In the context of food services, EPR can have significant implications, including:

1.  Packaging Waste Management

 •             Responsibility for Waste Collection and Recycling: Food service providers may be required to finance and manage the collection, recycling, and disposal of packaging waste.

•             Recycling Targets: Producers might have to meet specific recycling targets for packaging materials, ensuring a certain percentage of their packaging is recycled.

2.  Use of Sustainable Materials

 •             Material Restrictions: EPR policies often restrict the use of non-recyclable or non-compostable materials in packaging. Food service providers may need to switch to sustainable materials like plant-based fibers and starches.

•             Eco-Design Requirements: Products may need to be designed for easier recycling or composting, influencing the choice of materials and packaging designs used by food services.

3.  Financial Contributions to Waste Management Systems

•             Fees and Levies: Food service businesses may be required to pay fees based on the amount and type of packaging they produce. These fees fund waste management and recycling programs.

•             Deposit-Refund Systems: Some EPR schemes include deposit-refund systems for beverage containers and other packaging, where consumers pay a deposit that is refunded when the container is returned for recycling.

4.  Labeling and Consumer Information

 •             Mandatory Labeling: EPR regulations may require clear labeling of packaging to inform consumers about proper disposal methods (e.g., recyclable, compostable, or landfill).

•             Consumer Education: Producers might need to invest in consumer education campaigns to promote proper recycling and disposal practices.

5.  Reporting and Compliance

 •             Reporting Obligations: Food service businesses may have to report the types and amounts of packaging they put on the market and the measures they take to manage it.

•             Compliance with Regulations: Ensuring compliance with local, regional, and national EPR regulations can be mandatory, requiring ongoing monitoring and adaptation of practices.

Examples of EPR in Practice:

•             California’s SB 54: This legislation requires packaging producers to take responsibility for the recycling and disposal of their products, aiming to reduce plastic waste.

•             European Union’s Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive: This directive mandates that member states implement EPR schemes for packaging, promoting recycling and the use of sustainable materials.

Implications for Food Services:

 •             Increased Costs: Compliance with EPR can result in higher costs for food service providers, including fees for waste management and investments in sustainable packaging.

•             Operational Changes: Businesses may need to redesign packaging, establish new waste management processes, and ensure compliance with labeling and reporting requirements.

•             Competitive Advantage: Adopting sustainable practices and complying with EPR can enhance brand reputation and appeal to eco-conscious consumers, providing a competitive edge.

By adhering to EPR policies, food service providers can contribute to a more sustainable waste management system, reduce their environmental impact, and align with growing consumer demand for responsible business practices.

 The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors approved the sustainable food ware ordinance in April 2022 to reduce plastic blight, unburden landfills and reduce our dependence on harmful fossil fuels. The vote made Los Angeles County the largest municipality in the nation to take aggressive action against the scourge of single-use plastics.

 Most recycling facilities in greater L.A. do not accept food service ware of any kind because of their size and contamination.

‍